‏إظهار الرسائل ذات التسميات Caucasus. إظهار كافة الرسائل
‏إظهار الرسائل ذات التسميات Caucasus. إظهار كافة الرسائل

18‏/12‏/2018

The Last Of The Departed

In the struggle for the Caucasus between czarist Russia and Circassians all the Adygs and Ubykhs and more than half the Abkhazians migrated across the Black Sea. The Ubykhs with their ancient history and culture ceased to exist. The old Ubykh is plagued by the question, "Could it have been otherwise? "And this is also the concern of the author, Bagrat Shinkuba, who finds the answer in the Abkhazian proverb: He who loses his home land loses all.



05‏/12‏/2017

القوقازيون الشراكسة - أبراموف 1884 (دراسة متوفرة باللغات العربية و الروسية)

".....ومع هذا فانني أعتقد انه سيتضح للقارئ أن الجبلي (القفقاسي) يصنع لنفسه أرضا على الصخور العارية بجهده فقط وبالعرق والدم, ويجب عليه أن يرتبط بلهفة الى أرضه, ومع هذا فعندما يترك أرضه ويرحل الى تركيا حيث الآلام والعذاب فأن الرحيل لايكون بسبب كسله!"



لتحميل الكتاب

Скачать книгу

24‏/10‏/2017

تعرف على شركيسيا قرية نيباجاي - Ныбэджай - Nibadjai

قرية نيباجاي - Ныбэджай - Nibadjai

نهر في مناطق النتخواي (إحدى القبائل الشركسية) وكانت تقع عليه قرية شركسية تسمى بنفس الاسم . في عام 1862 تم تهجير اهلها وسكن فيها مجموعة من المستوطنيين القوزاق  وفي نفس العام من ليلة الرابع من أيلول هاجمت قوة شركسية قاطع عسكري قوزاقي تابع للجيش القيصري الروسي بالقرب من المنطقة يسمى قاطع لبيسكي وقضت على جميع أفرادها. وبعد تهجير الشركس من المنطقة أستوطنت 153 عائلة قوزاقية المنطقة وفي العام 1882 بني نصب تذكاري تخليدا للقوزاق الذين قتلوا في المعركة ضد الشركس (السكان الاصليين). اليوم تسمي بالروسية نيبارجايفسكايا ويسكن في البلدة بالاضافة للروس والقوزاق جالية أزيدية كوردية وبعض العائلات الارمنية وطبعا لا وجود للشركس السكان الاصليين ويمكن أن يكون احفادهم من شركس المهجر هنا وهناك.

موقع نيباجاي على الخارطة

القاطع العسكري القوزاقي

نصب تخليد القوزاق الذين سقطوا في المعركة مع الشركس

10‏/09‏/2015

Human rights council says Russia should accept Syrian Circassian refugees

Maxim Shevchenko

 The council plans to ask Russian President Vladimir Putin to give green light to accepting the refugees

Russia’s presidential council for civil society and human rights suggests that Russia should take in refugees from the crisis-hit Syria, the Izvestia newspaper reported on Thursday.

"To accept the refugees, there is a need for political will," a council member Maxim Shevchenko, who has proposed the initiative, was quoted by the newspaper as saying.
The council plans to ask Russian President Vladimir Putin to give green light to accepting the refugees, he said.

Russia may host some 5,000 or 10,000 Circassians, an ethnic group of North Caucasian origin who were displaced in the 19th century, he said. Some 80,000 Circassians currently live in Syria.

The refugees could return to their historic homeland in Russia’s Adygea, Karachay-Cherkessia, Kabardino-Balkaria and the Krasnodar Territory, Shevchenko said.

"This people have a very high level of civilian and social responsibility," he said rejecting an earlier statement of the Russian Interior Ministry’s center for combating extremism that the move could pose a security threat.
First published by TASS:

The article in Russian language

03‏/07‏/2015

Unique documents on Denikin's talks with mountaineers brought from France to Chechnya

One of the jewels of the archive, which Chechnya has received from France, are the reports of Europeans on the situation in the Caucasus in 1917-1921, as well as documents about the negotiations of Anton Denikin with mountaineers, said Mairbek Vachagaev, a historian. For a long time, the events in Northern Caucasus during the Civil War were covered one-sidedly and require an independent study, experts say. 
 The "Caucasian Knot" has reported that in June this year Mairbek Vachagaev, President of the Association of Caucasian Studies in Paris, handed over to the Archival Department of Chechnya 50,000 pages of archival materials on history of the Caucasus, which he had copied in France.
 In November 1917, in the territory of Dagestan and highland districts of the Terek Region of the Russian Empire the Mountain Republic was proclaimed. The government of the republic was dissolved in the spring of 1919, after the territory of Dagestan was occupied by troops of General Denikin. From September 1919 to March 1920, the Islamic state of North-Caucasian Emirate existed in the territory of Dagestan and Chechnya.
 The study of these documents helps to understand how Frenchmen, Germans, Turks and Britons treated the situation in Northern Caucasus in 1917-1921. 
 According to Vachagaev, of particular interest are the documents about the characteristics, which were issued to mountain leaders, as well as the correspondence of mountaineers with European states. These materials present a lot of new facts about the relationships of mountaineers with Cossacks and Bolshevik.

Source: http://eng.kavkaz-uzel.ru/articles/32186/ 


Note: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the Blog

22‏/06‏/2015

Challenging Moscow, Circassians Seek to Overcome Alphabet Divide


Paul Goble

            Staunton, June 17 – The Soviet regime’s divide and rule approach to the Circassian nation not only left them divided among four subjects of the Russian Federation but also gave them different alphabets, an effort to keep the 500,000 Circassians of the North Caucasus from coming together and joining hands with the more than five million co-ethnics in the Middle East.

            The post-Soviet Russian government has made it clear that it will block any effort to unite the Circassian territories into a common homeland, but now Circassians from these four regions and abroad are challenging Russian ethnic management in another way and demanding a common alphabet for the dialects that Moscow has promoted as separate language.

            Coming up with a common alphabet is no easy task, and there is certain to be opposition both from Moscow, fearful that even this step could empower the Circassians and trigger further instability in the North Caucasus, and from among the Circassians who are far from united on which alphabet should be chosen and whether this is an appropriate next step for the movement.

            Since Gorbachev’s time, Circassians in the North Caucasus have talked about the need for a common alphabet to help overcome dialect differences, to promote a common Circassian literary language, and on the basis of that alphabet and language to promote a unified Circassian nation that would be in a better position to advance its political goals.

            But those efforts have fallen victim not only to internal disagreements over which of several alphabets, Cyrillic, Latin, or traditional Circassian, should be used, whether the dialects are that close, and whether changing alphabets would in fact undermine unity by cutting off Circassian young people from the culture produced in the existing scripts but also by Moscow and by some republic leaders who are concerned about their positions.

            Now, the issue has been joined again. On May 19, the International Circassian Association formed a commission which is supposed to come up with a program for a unified Circassian alphabet based on Cyrillic as well as for a common literary language to be presented in September at the organization’s tenths congress (kavkaz-uzel.ru/articles/264019).

            Supporters of this idea are enthusiastic and see no insurmountable problems: Petr Ivanov, director of the Kabardino-Balkaria Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, says that such a move is “the normal reaction of a small people seeking to preserve itself” from assimilation (kavkaz-uzel.ru/articles/264071/).
 
            And other Circassian experts including Khaisha Timizhev of the KBR State University and Kabardin Congress president Aslan Beshto argue that there are no insurmountable obstacles to having a common alphabet and that such a move will not lead to any “levelling” of the varieties of experience among the various Circassian groups.

            “We are a single people, we have a common psychology and a common artistic worldview,” Ivanov says, and consequently, it is time to have a common alphabet.

              But commentator Anzor Daur is skeptical, arguing that Moscow will block the move lest alphabet unity lead to political unity in the North Caucasus and expanded ties with Circassians abroad.  And he suggests Moscow will play up differences among Circassians about what alphabet they should adopt (onkavkaz.com/news/63-cherkesam-ne-dadut-sozdat-edinyi-alfavit.html).

             Those most influenced from abroad will likely seek a Latin script, but that is a red flag for Moscow which has refused to allow the Tatars and Bashkirs to shift to the Latin script lest it expand their identification with Turkey. Those more philological inclined may want to go back to the ancient Circassian alphabet but restoring it would be very difficult.

            Consequently, Daur says, if any change is going to happen, it almost certainly will have to follow the leader of the International Circassian Association which has made it clear that it seeks a Cyrillic-based script for Circassians in the North Caucasus.  It would be truly ironic if the use of this Russian script would promote the national aspirations of the Circassians
 
Note: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the Blog  

19‏/06‏/2015

The Circassian Colonies at Ammân and Jerash



By Dean A. Walker
 The Biblical World, Vol. 4, No. 3. (Sep., 1894), pp. 202-204.
 The University of Chicago 


Ammân, the Rabbah, or Rabbath-Ammon of the Bible and the Philadelphia of the Grecian period, where Uriah the Hittite was treacherously exposed to death in accordance with David’s secret orders, is situated about a mile below the source of the river Jabbok, the modern Zerka, whose narrow valley at this point is filled with the ruins of the town of the Græco-Roman period. Among these ruins a colony of Circassians have lately established their homes. The word seems almost a mockery here. We think of a home as a place about which tender associations have had time to gather, till the place itself becomes as much an object of affection as the members of the family whose mutual affection makes the place a home. But the Circassians at Ammân have hardly had time to form such associations, and the place is to them more like a place of exile than a home.
When, by the treaty of Adrianople in 1829, Turkey, assuming an authority that did not belong to her, ceded to Russia the territory of the independent Circassians in the Caucasus, they refused to acknowledge the new authority, and waged a brave and often successful war for independence. And when at length in 1864, their resistance was broken, the entire nation to the number of 500,000, rather than submit to Russian rule, immigrated into Ottoman territory, leaving a wilderness behind them. The Ottoman government quartered them in various parts of its dominion and portions of them were located in Bulgaria. Here they had hardly had time to get settled, when the Russo-Turkish war of 1876-8 again drove them from their homes, enrolled the men in the Turkish army and sent their families as refugees to Constantinople. At the close of the war, they could not return to Bulgaria, now under Russian control, so they were again distributed and a portion of the were sent to people the ruins of Ammân, where they must hold their ground against the Bedouin Arabs as best they could. This was about the year 1878. Three years later, a second colony arrived in Moab and were located at Jerash, one day to the north of Ammân on a small brook tributary to the Zerka. 

It is not strange that a people naturally brave and independent, inheriting the hardy physique of their mountaineer ancestors and now embittered by a second expatriation, should make themselves obnoxious to the people among whom they have come. Such is the case with the Circassians here. They have taken from the Bedouin a share of their business of providing safe conduct for travelers at a price, and in any quarrels that may arise, they have that ugly European habit of shooting to kill if they shoot at all, which the Bedouin considers a very ungentlemanly mode of warfare; too abrupt, and based on the mercenary idea that a man’s property is worth more than the life of the man who tries to take it away from him. The orthodox way to settle the little difficulties that arise between strangers in Bedouin etiquette is for the would-be robber and the reluctant robbee to compare notes as to their relative strength, taking into account both numbers and equipment of the respective parties, and then whichever party is found inferior should yield gracefully, the robber abandoning his purpose if they are evenly matched, and the robbee giving up his goods if the count is against him. Of course there will be times when the parties cannot agree on the count; but in any case, moral suasion should never be carried beyond a few flesh wounds. To kill entails the dreaded blood feud, which both parties are loath to originate.
But the Circassian’s disregard of such considerations, in which respect he is more reckless than most of his fellow Europeans, makes him a difficult fellow to deal with. In the first place, if a count is to be taken of numbers and equipment, he insists on throwing his personal courage also, like the sword of Brennus, into the scale, which often makes the price of the booty come higher than the robber cares to pay. And in the second place, he takes matters too seriously, and his gun is liable to go off prematurely, when your Bedouin is not intending to fight, but only to intimidate as a preliminary to negotiation. The superintendent of a liquorice factory at Alexandretta, for which the root is dug in the interior along the Euphrates and Tigris rivers, sends the wages of the diggers, a bag of gold, by the hands of two Circassians, knowing that no ordinary robber will attempt to take it from them and that they will defend it with their last breath.

So these Circassians at Ammân and Jerash are not on good terms with their neighbors. The colonies are small; there are but few women and children. In occasional quarrels, their numbers are diminishing. They do not themselves hope that they can long hold their ground; yet they have gone to work to make for themselves homes, and poor though they are, they are realizing out there in the wilderness among the ruins of Ammân the true idea of home.
The word home is Teutonic; the Arabic language can come no nearer to it than the word house, and a house is not a home. But as we rode into Ammân, after seeing for days nothing of human habitations but the black hair-cloth tents of the Bedouin, or the bare mud-walled hovels, we seemed to have descended upon a bit of Europe transplanted into Asia. The most striking feature was the amount of wood-work; first seen in the neat wooden casements of doors and windows, then in a wooden hay-rick; next in a large wicker-work corn-crib, with sides sloping out and plastered with clay to keep the rats from climbing its sides; and finally, we came upon a two-wheeled cart, on which a movable wicker-work top could be adjusted to convert it into a hay cart, giving a slight suggestion of the traveling van of the ancient Celts and Germans. We seemed to have come upon a European farmyard, and this, with the decidedly European features of the people and the style of dress of the women, gave the traveler a home feeling, if not a home-sick one. The dress of the men, too, though characteristically Circassian with the skirted coat and the row of cartridge pockets across the breast, was European in color and texture. Along with the cart went also the cart-path, leading up into the juniper woods near the town, where trees had been felled and cord wood stacked and chips lay scattered about on the ground, rare sights in Moab and all suggestive of an enterprise and thrift so in contrast with the slow and shiftless life of the Bedouin as to call to mind the like:
‘‘Better fifty years of Europe than a cycle of Cathay.’’

17‏/06‏/2015

Our European ancestors brought farming, languages and a love of dairy, study shows

Thousands of Bronze Age migrants from the Caucuses came to northern Europe in a major movement of prehistoric people in the third millennium BC


The making of modern Europe began in earnest about 5,000 years ago when a mass migration of people from what is now southern Russia and Georgia introduced new technology, languages and dairy farming to the continent, a study has found

Thousands of Bronze Age migrants from the Caucuses came to northern Europe in a major movement of prehistoric people in the third millennium BC, according to the largest research project of its kind that analyzed the genetic makeup of more than 100 ancient skeletons from the period.
The migrants brought new metal skills, spoke what became the basis of almost every other European language – from Greek and Latin to German and English – and carried a genetic mutation that allowed adults to drink cow’s milk

This lactose-tolerance gene, which enables adults to digest the sugar in milk, is still more prevalent in north Europeans today than in most other regions of the world. This illustrates the historic importance of dairy food in the North European diet, the scientists said



The mass migration was one of the most significant in European history, equivalent to the colonization of the Americas, and was a transformative period in terms of the change in languages and culture that it brought about, the researchers believe.
“The single most important finding from our study is that the Bronze Age, which is relatively recent, is when the major genetic landscape affecting modern-day Europeans was formed. It’s a surprise as it happened so recently,” said Eske Willerslev, professor of evolutionary genetics at the University of Copenhagen

“Our study is the first, real large-scale population genomic study ever undertaken on ancient individuals. We analyzed genome sequence data from 101 past individuals. This is more than a doubling of the number of genomic sequenced individuals of prehistoric man generated to date,” Professor Willerslev said

“The results show that the genetic composition and distribution of peoples in Europe and Asia today is a surprisingly late phenomenon, only a few thousand years old,” he said

The genomic analysis, published in the journal Nature, indicates that the Yamnaya people who lived in the Caucuses about 5,000 years ago were responsible for spreading not just their innovative cultural ideas and languages, but their DNA across a vast area extending from the Urals to Scandinavia.
They effectively replaced the older Neolithic farmers and hunter-gatherers who had occupied the northern Europe for thousands of years previously, presumably aided by the Yamnaya’s ability to smelt bronze and copper and herd cattle, Professor Willerslev said.
“They brought with them new technology, new family structures, new religion and new ways of burying their dead. They also brought the start of cities. They were a high-tech culture,” he said

The Yamnaya also probably introduced genes for brown eyes, pale skin and tall stature to northern Europeans in the third millennium BC, which at that time was inhabited by dark skinned, blue-eyed, short people, he said.
Crucially, they also brought the lactose-tolerance mutation that would allow adults to drink cow’s milk, a useful genetic attribute for healthy nutrition

“Previously, the common belief was that lactose tolerance developed in the Balkans or in the Middle East in connection with the introduction of farming during the Stone Age,” said Martin Sikora of the Natural History Museum in Copenhagen, a co-author of the study

“But now we can see that even late in the Bronze Age the mutation that gives rise to the tolerance is rare in Europe. We think that it may have been introduced into Europe with the Yamnaya herders from the Caucasus but that the selection that has made most Europeans lactose tolerant has happened at a much later time,” Dr Sikora said

Professor Kristian Kristiansen, an archaeologist at the University of Gothenburg, said the study resolves some of the questions about whether this period in prehistory was dominated by the movement of ideas or the migration and settlement of people en masse.
“The old Neolithic farming cultures were replaced by a completely new perception of family, property and personhood. I and other archaeologists share the opinion that these changes came about as a result of massive migrations,” Professor Kristiansen said

The study, led by Morten Allentoft of the Natural History Museum in Copenhagen, also found that the Yamnaya people migrated east to occupy parts of Central Asia. They were eventually replaced by eastern Asians about 2,000 years ago.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/our-european-ancestors-brought-farming-languages-and-a-love-of-dairy-study-shows-10311317.html 

كتاب تاريخ الأديغة القديم история адыхейского народа

المؤلف: شورا بكمرزا نوغمو. المترجم: شوكت المفتي حبجوقه. عدد الصفحات: 204 سنة النشر: 1953 باللغة العربية و الطبعة الأساسية باللغ...